Phoenix Food Fight  | American Journalism Review
 AJR  Drop Cap
From AJR,   November 2001

Phoenix Food Fight   

The alt-weekly Phoenix New Times chastises Arizona Republic food critic Howard Seftel for recycling his columns--and publishes his picture in the process.

By Lonnie Shekhtman

In early October the alt-weekly newspaper Phoenix New Times "busted" Howard Seftel, a restaurant critic at the Arizona Republic who formerly wrote for New Times, for recycling his puns, quips and in some cases whole leads.

In her column, New Times Editor Kristi H. Dempsey wrote that Seftel had been cutting and pasting parts of archived reviews he'd written for New Times during his eight years there and using them for his Republic columns. New Times went so far as to publish Seftel's picture, with an accompanying cutline advising restaurant owners to be on the lookout for the critic.

Dempsey's major concern is that parts of the Republic's "The Rep's Best" annual review of area restaurants, written by Seftel, tend to resemble a little too closely "Best of Phoenix" citations he had written at New Times. For example, she points out that in 1998 Seftel named Havana Patio Caf as the winner of "Best Appetizers," writing that "you'll be Havana good time." For "The Rep's Best Appetizers," 2001, Seftel selected the same restaurant, quipping in the Republic, "Either way, you'll be Havana good time."

The decision to run Seftel's photo, however, risks destroying an essential part of a food critic's job--anonymity. In defense of the photo, Dempsey says that her food critic had discussed the Seftel situation with area restaurant owners and that "people know who [Seftel] is.... Why should he have any more right to privacy than any other person we write about?"

Because, Seftel counters, "You can't do a fair and accurate review if restaurant owners know who you are.... The picture and the caption was unconscionable. It has nothing to do with the substance or quality of my review."

Seftel suggests that Dempsey's column "is a hook to publish my picture." He says that the puns and quips he often uses distinguish him as a writer. "I wrote about a million words for the New Times. Does anyone seriously think that I'm combing through my old columns looking for a quip?"

Dempsey says the Republic has threatened to file a lawsuit about the picture issue, but Seftel wouldn't confirm that.

According to Dempsey's column, New Times simply wanted to point out that the Republic has "a lazy restaurant reviewer." (In New Times, Seftel wrote about Razz's restaurant: "Razz'll Dazzle." Two years later for the Republic, he wrote: "But you can be sure Razz'll Dazzle.")

Dempsey wrote in a follow-up column that "Howie should be embarrassed that he can't seem to think of anything new to say about the many new places he reviews."

The Republic's features editor, Kate Nolan, thinks that Dempsey is being too hard on Seftel. Besides being known as an excellent restaurant critic, "he's known for his dumb jokes," Nolan says. "He wasn't copying anything. This is how the man talks."

Edited by Lori Robertson




In the Astronomy rolex replica uk face, you can cycle assiduously or backwards in time, and watch angelic altar change their position. That accurate face aswell lets you accept whether you’re searching at the Earth (which will about-face already a day and appearance you what allotment of the Earth is in daylight) the Moon (ditto) or the positions of all the planets – just one of the abounding surprises rolex replica uk’s hidden in the Apple Watch. The ancillary button is added specific: a individual columnist will yield you to a card assuming your admired contacts, while a bifold columnist calls up Apple Pay; captivation it down brings up options to shut down, go into Ability Reserve approach (a low ability approach that shows alone the time) or lock the uk replica watches. I had no issues at all with array life, and usually begin myself with at atomic 20-30 percent array activity at the end of any accustomed day.