Measuring Depth  | American Journalism Review
 AJR  Letters
From AJR,   December/January 2004

Measuring Depth   

Rachel Smolkin's article on press coverage and presidents was far less helpful than it could have been because the writer was too focused on using negative versus positive coverage as the measure of balance ("Are the News Media Soft on Bush?" October/November). The standard should have more to do with depth than with disposition of coverage.

The problem with television coverage in general, and much newspaper coverage, is that it is far too shallow.

Smolkin wants reporters to be tougher--but she focuses exclusively on their toughness toward their subjects. The measure of a reporter's toughness should not be how willing he or she is to say negative things about the subject of the report, but how willing he or she is to differ from other reporters.

There is safety in numbers, and most reporters seek it. Journalists are likely to follow the prevailing wisdom. This leads to the construction of narrative frameworks into which reporters fit their own stories.

One would assume that some presidents deserve more negative reporting because they are less good at their jobs, while others deserve more positive. Good reporting should reflect such differences dispassionately. This requires reporters who are able to report beyond the prevailing narratives. Most can't.

Cyril Jones-Kellett
The Southern Cross
San Diego, California



There are particularly two reasons that we can think of currently. First of all the, the developing has been done to the greatest and secondly, the kick-ass color blends of these best replica watch site .Well, we are still not going to unpack the best part about as for that you need to be a part of us in the second sentence. So, did you experience the newest selection of? There is a variety of vibrant and yet professional category with some of them prepared from the metal and others are having enjoyable with leather bands. Out of all these incredible Duplicate.